Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts

Thursday, July 9, 2026

MK-ULTRA - Experimenting On Humans to Brainwash and Control


MK-ULTRA was an illegal mind-control research program.

MK-ULTRA was an illegal mind-control research program that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency operated between 1953 and 1964. The CIA conducted experiments using high doses of LSD and other drugs, hypnosis, electroshock, and sensory deprivation on subjects who often had no idea that they were part of a covert test. The ultimate goal was to find a way to erase the memory and then control the mind as a tool in fighting the Cold War. In his book Poisoner in Chief: Sidney Gottlieb and the CIA Search for Mind Control, author and journalist Stephen Kinzer called the program “essentially a continuation of work that began in Japanese and Nazi concentration camps,” in part because Nazi doctors and others who had worked in those environments were recruited to continue their research as part of the program. Fearing discovery, the CIA destroyed most records of the experiments in 1973, but details of the program later emerged through congressional and journalistic investigations.

Program’s beginnings

The roots of MK-ULTRA go back to U.S. Pres. Harry Truman’s administration, when the CIA launched Project Bluebird, its original mind-control program. Allen Dulles, who became the head of the CIA’s covert operations in 1951, latched onto Bluebird. He sent an early memo to Frank Wisner, a senior officer who was helping to oversee the program, saying that he wanted to explore “augmenting the usual interrogation methods by the use of drugs, hypnosis, shock, etc.” Under Dulles’s leadership, the CIA began opening its own secret prisons in West Germany and Japan, where it experimented on prisoners with no oversight. Advising this early research was Gen. Walter Schreiber, the former surgeon general of the Nazi army, who had approved experiments at the Auschwitz and Dachau concentration camps.

What’s in a name?

Over the years the MK-ULTRA program was given a number of monikers.
Project Bluebird: Name for Harry Truman-era mind-control program
Operation Artichoke: Name given to the program in 1951 by the CIA’s Allen Dulles
MK-ULTRA: Name given by Dulles in 1953 to reflect the program’s “ultra-sensitive nature”
MK-SEARCH: Name given to the successor of MK-ULTRA in 1964, after it was determined that mind control could not be achieved

Dulles became convinced that the Soviet Union had already developed mind-control tactics. There were rumors that the U.S.S.R. could program people to make false confessions and possibly train them to kill on command. Dulles saw the Bluebird research as increasingly urgent, and in August 1951 he ordered that the program be expanded and intensified. He renamed it Artichoke.

Sidney Gottlieb, a chemist who had recently joined the CIA as its top drug expert, was tasked with overseeing the research. Gottlieb and his colleagues set about finding a drug that would act as a “truth serum” in investigations and would make it possible to reprogram people and then wipe their memories clear.

Experimenting with LSD

Gottlieb learned that cocaine, heroin, and mescaline had failed in prior government experiments, so he turned to LSD. In 1953 he arranged for the CIA to spend $240,000 to buy the world’s entire supply of the drug. The agency later arranged for pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Company to replicate the formula, so it had an endless supply. Gottlieb distributed LSD to hospitals, clinics, and other institutions, asking them to give it to patients and see how they reacted. He did this through fake foundations, so many institutions carrying out these experiments never knew they were doing the work of the CIA. Some of the those who participated in the experiments amounted to a who’s who of the ’50s and ’60s counterculture movements, including author Ken Kesey, poet Allen Ginsberg, and members of the Grateful Dead. It was also used heavily on prisoners, mentally ill people, and people experiencing addiction—“people who could not fight back,” as one CIA officer put it.

In April 1953 the mind-control program was expanded and intensified once again and was given the name MK-ULTRA, reflecting what Dulles called its “ultra-sensitive nature.”

Whitey Bulger

Whitey Bulger Shown in a 1959 mug shot, Whitey Bulger was subject in 1957 to an MK Ultra experiment in which he was given LSD almost daily for 15 months.

In 1957 Whitey Bulger was incarcerated at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary after being convicted of truck hijacking and armed robbery. Bulger would go on to become known as a leading organized crime boss in Boston, but in the late 1950s he agreed to participate in an experiment that he was told was intended to cure schizophrenia. In exchange for participating he and other incarcerated people would receive time off their sentences. As part of the experiment, the subjects were given LSD almost daily for 15 months. The results, as Bulger described them, were horrific:

The program expanded over the next decade and came to include 149 subprojects. At least 80 institutions, 44 universities and colleges, and 185 researchers were involved in some capacity.

Research methods and results

Despite its size and scope, the program operated in extreme secrecy; fewer than half a dozen agency leaders knew about it at any given time. This meant that Gottlieb’s power was essentially unchecked. He was allowed to bring in prisoners from across the United States and around the world and subject them to torture and other experiments. He was never expected to formally report on his work.

However, the research never produced the results that Gottlieb, Dulles, and others were hoping for. By the early ’60s Gottlieb was beginning to give up on it. He wrote in a 1960 memo that “no effective knockout pill, truth serum, aphrodisiac, or recruitment pill was known to exist.” He had learned that through drugs, electroshock, sensory deprivation, and other abuse, it was possible to destroy a human mind—but not to “open the wiped-away mind to control by an outsider,” Kinzer wrote. The program wound down in 1963 and in 1964 was replaced with a tamer project called MK-SEARCH.

Destroying the evidence

Nine years later most records of the program were destroyed. In late 1972 U.S. Pres. Richard Nixon told Richard Helms, the CIA director, that he would be replaced after the upcoming inauguration. Before Helms left office, he summoned Gottlieb for a meeting. They agreed that the MK-ULTRA files would be purged—to avoid public outrage and likely to ensure that no one would be prosecuted. The chief of the CIA records center balked at Helms’s order to destroy the documents, so Gottlieb drove to the facility in person. Ultimately seven boxes of MK-ULTRA progress reports were shredded.

However, other files dealing with the program were later discovered. The reporter Seymour Hersh revealed the existence of MK-ULTRA in a 1974 New York Times story. Three government investigations followed, but they were hampered by the destruction of the documents. No researchers were ever federally investigated.

Brainwashing

brainwashing, systematic effort to persuade nonbelievers to accept a certain allegiance, command, or doctrine. A colloquial term, it is more generally applied to any technique designed to manipulate human thought or action against the desire, will, or knowledge of the individual. By controlling the physical and social environment, an attempt is made to destroy loyalties to any unfavourable groups or individuals, to demonstrate to the individual that his attitudes and patterns of thinking are incorrect and must be changed, and to develop loyalty and unquestioning obedience to the ruling party.

The term is most appropriately used in reference to a program of political or religious indoctrination or ideological remolding. The techniques of brainwashing typically involve isolation from former associates and sources of information; an exacting regimen requiring absolute obedience and humility; strong social pressures and rewards for cooperation; physical and psychological punishments for non-cooperation ranging from social ostracism and criticism, deprivation of food, sleep, and social contacts, to bondage and torture; and continual reinforcement.

The nature of brainwashing as it occurred in communist political prisons received widespread attention after the Chinese Communist victory in 1949 and after the Korean and Vietnamese wars. More recently, its reported use in fringe religious cults and radical political groups has aroused concern in the United States.

Deprogramming, or reversing the effects of brainwashing through intensive psychotherapy and confrontation, has proved somewhat successful, particularly with religious cult members.

Friday, March 20, 2026

The Middle East is Changing Dramatically.

The Changes in the Middle East is Going to Change World Warfare - For the Better!

The Iranian regime just made a fatal geopolitical miscalculation! After a third Iranian missile crossed into Turkish airspace and threatened Incirlik Air Base, NATO activated its ultimate defense shield. Within hours, Patriot batteries were deployed, and the Kürecik X-band radar began tracking every move inside Iran.

But Ankara's response isn't just defensive. By initiating joint military exercise talks with Azerbaijan in Nakhchivan and pulling nuclear-armed Pakistan into the equation, Turkey is engineering a massive, 3-front encirclement of Iran. With 3.2 million Iranians already displaced and heading for the borders, a total state collapse is looming.

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Ukraine's $200 Billion U.S. Aid, Zelensky Asks 'Where is the Money"?

On February 2, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said he had only received $75 billion of the $175 billion the United States had spent on Ukraine. The cry went up, what happened to the other $100 billion? Was it lost or stolen? The answer is no. Only part of the aid goes through Ukrainian control. A large part pays for activities as a result of the war but not to Ukraine directly. These include the United States training of Ukrainian forces, global humanitarian assistance, additional costs of U.S. surge forces in Europe, and intelligence support for both NATO and Ukraine.

As CSIS has reported before, “aid to Ukraine” is a misnomer because 90 percent of military aid is spent in the United States. Of aid overall, 60 percent is spent in the United States, about 25 percent is spent in Ukraine, and the final 15 percent is spent globally.

Q1: What did President Zelensky say that started this controversy?

A1: In an interview with the Associated Press on February 2, Zelensky stated: When I hear that America gave Ukraine hundreds of billions [of dollars], 177, to be more precise . . . as the president of a warring country, I can tell you that we received just over 75 . . . We are talking about specific things, because we got it, not with money but with weapons. There is training, there is additional transport, there are not only prices for weapons. There were humanitarian programs, social, etc. . . . $100 billion of these 177, we never received. When it’s said that Ukraine received $200 billion to support the army during the war, that is not true. I don’t know where all the money is.

The statement is a bit confusing since he was speaking off the cuff in a video interview. He refers to both $177 billion and $200 billion. He speaks about supporting the “army” where aid helped all elements of the Ukrainian armed forces, and he appears to include only weapons as aid “received.”

Q2: How was that interpreted?

A2: Many people asked where the “missing” $100 billion went and seized on the statement, “I don’t know where all the money is.”

Comment sections of media reports flamed with accusations of corruption and malfeasance. Some online commentators speculated about corruption by the CIA, Ukrainian officials, or former President Joe Biden. Some linked it to viral social media claims alleging a conspiracy involving U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) payments to celebrities to visit Ukraine. Others cited this as evidence of government waste, suggesting the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) investigate and identify cuts. DOGE had previously raised concerns about the U.S. government’s ability to track aid to Ukraine. Members of Congress and Elon Musk, who leads DOGE, amplified posts questioning the misuse of aids.

General Keith Kellogg, the Trump administration’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, denied these interpretations. He noted that “we have a pretty good accounting of where it is going” and that most appropriated funds are spent in the United States.

Nevertheless, the controversy has had an effect. In private conversations, Republican congressional staff members say that the confusion and hint of corruption have poisoned the possibility of further aid, at least in the near term.

Q3: So, what happened to the “missing” $100 billion?

A3: The short answer is that it is not missing. The funds went (mostly) to activities that arose because of the war, and all are accounted for. Some paid for sending equipment and funds directly to Ukraine. A large part went to activities that arose because of the war but were not spent in Ukraine. To see why this is the case, it is important to look at the funding as a whole.

Since 2022, Congress has appropriated $175.2 billion in aid as a result of the war in Ukraine, a slight difference from the $177 billion that Zelensky cites. This includes all funds in the five supplemental appropriations, $900 million in the regular budget but excludes $9 billion in loans. Most has been delivered, and most of the remainder has been obligated through contracts and binding commitments. However, it will take many years for all the contracts to be completed and the money disbursed.

In past analyses, CSIS has divided aid to Ukraine into categories to illustrate the different purposes. Figure 1 shows how the $175 billion is laid out in seven categories. It’s all there, the $75 billion Zelensky cites and the “missing” $100 billion.

Military equipment: Replacement of equipment sent to Ukraine from U.S. stockpiles (through Presidential Drawdown Authority) and foreign military financing of equipment for Ukraine. U.S. industrial base and general Department of Defense (DOD) spending: Items that enhance U.S. military capabilities, particularly the defense industrial base, but are not directly related to the war in Ukraine. Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI): Mostly money for Ukraine to procure equipment directly from U.S. manufacturers, also supports maintenance of Ukrainian equipment, training of Ukrainian personnel and units, and Ukraine-related intelligence activities.

U.S. forces: Funds for the extra costs of U.S. forces that surged to Europe in response to Russian aggression. Some of these surge forces have returned to the United States, but others remain. Humanitarian aid: Aid to relieve suffering because of the war. Mostly done through nongovernmental organizations in Europe for Ukrainian refugees, though some is spent in the United States and Ukraine. Some of the budget is also spent on global food relief. About $3 billion has gone to international development, unrelated to the war.

Economic: U.S. funds are provided to the Ukrainian government through the World Bank to make up for lost tax revenues and to keep governmental services operating. Other U.S. agencies: Funds for activities in U.S. agencies other than the DOD, Department of State, and USAID, for example, for the Department of the Treasury to enforce sanctions and for the Department of Energy to safeguard nuclear materials.

March 23, 2025 - 50,000 Palestinians Have Been Killed. What?

More than 50,000 Palestinians have been killed during Israel's military campaign in Gaza, the territory's Hamas-run health ministry has announced.

That number - 50,021 - equates to about 2.1% of the 2.3 million pre-war population of the territory, or around 1 in 46 people.

A total of 113,274 others had been injured in the same period, the health ministry said.

Figures from the Gaza Ministry of Health (MoH) have been widely used throughout the war and are seen as reliable by the United Nations (UN) and international institutions. But Israel has consistently refuted data published by Gaza's authorities.

International journalists, including the BBC, are blocked by Israel from entering Gaza independently, so are unable to verify figures from either side.

The figures released by the MoH for the number of people killed do not differentiate between civilians and fighters.

In November, the UN's Human Rights Office said its analysis showed close to 70% of verified victims over a six-month period were women and children.

In January, The Lancet medical journal published a study which suggested the death toll could in fact be substantially higher than official figures reported by MoH - by up to 41%.

The war was triggered by Hamas's attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people, mainly civilians, were killed and 251 other taken hostage.

Israel responded to the 7 October attack with a massive military offensive, which has caused vast destruction to homes and infrastructure, in addition to those killed or injured.

The MoH also reported on Sunday at least 39 deaths in the last 24 hours, bringing the total number of people killed to 673 since Israel resumed its military operations in the territory on Tuesday.

Saturday, March 22, 2025

How does the International Space Station work?

Silent Determination to Protect One's Self & Property.

The rise in gun violence and its implications for community safety have become pressing concerns in recent years. Data from Canada shows firearm-related violent crimes have reached their highest levels since records began in 2009, with incidents increasing by 8.9% in 2022 compared to the previous year. This trend is mirrored in other regions, with cities like Toronto and Hamilton experiencing record-breaking numbers of shootings2. The surge in gun-related crimes, including carjackings and armed robberies, has left many families questioning how to protect themselves.

The Debate on Self-Defense

The idea of families arming themselves for protection is a contentious one. Advocates argue that owning firearms can provide a means of defense against threats like home invasions or carjackings. However, experts emphasize that self-defense is not solely about owning a weapon. Situational awareness, safety planning, and self-defense training are critical components of personal and family safety.

Addressing Carjackings and Holdups

Carjackings, often involving firearms, have become a growing concern. Experts recommend strategies such as maintaining situational awareness, avoiding high-risk areas, and keeping car doors locked and windows up when stationary6. In the event of an attack, prioritizing personal safety over material possessions is crucial.

Concerns About Tyranny

The rise in violent crimes has also sparked broader societal fears, including concerns about the erosion of democratic freedoms and the potential for authoritarianism. Historians and political analysts suggest that defending democratic institutions and fostering community resilience are vital in countering such fears.

Moving Forward

While the increase in gun violence is alarming, solutions require a multifaceted approach. Strengthening community ties, advocating for effective gun control measures, and investing in public safety initiatives are essential steps. Families can also take proactive measures by creating safety plans, enrolling in self-defense classes, and staying informed about local crime trends.

The path forward lies in balancing individual safety with collective action to address the root causes of violence. By fostering a culture of awareness and preparedness, communities can work towards a safer future.

The Case for Armed Self-Defense

In situations where intruders are armed, physical confrontation or reliance on traditional self-defense techniques may not be enough. Proponents of firearm ownership assert that good citizens should have the freedom to protect themselves and their loved ones with equal force. They view this as a fundamental right tied to personal safety and security.

Friday, March 14, 2025

Trump BEGS Putin to spare Thousands of Ukr Soldiers encircled.

Russia's Response To Trump Is A Masterclass in Ukraine Ceasefire

I have seen inside Ukraine video images and it look very sad. No democracy, only fear and corruption. Young man are being kidnapped to the front lines and there are wire fences everywhere. Its very sad. And yet the media is NOT addressing this, only the FORCES. How bout we all start covering the "people of Ukraine" that can't talk, are fearful of talking. Even people outside the country are still fearful of talking about what is going on in Ukraine.

Friday, March 7, 2025

Even Ukraine Can’t Believe What NORWAY Just Did in Massive Support!

It is amazing how Europe is rallying to Ukraine and rightfully so. But why is Canada outspending support for Ukraine? Trudeau is offering and spending money that he should not be. He resigned and wa fired by the Canadian people. 90% of Canadian do not like Trudeau. Why would the Canadian government allow Trudeau to offer and negotiate Canadian taxpaper dollars? There should be a proxy in Canada to look after foreign affirs, but not Trudeau...who is known to be the most corrupt prime minister in Canadian history. Canada, get him OUT of international affairs, the people demand it.